Oct

27

Checkers and logic

October 27, 2022 |

nand from computer circuitry, checkers, or move from 4:00 ET to 4:15. this was my most important post of the week. the circuitry for computers, based on Boolean algebra, has paths for and, not, or, and nand ("not and", false only when all inputs are true). in checkers there are usually two moves that are likely. the checker moves are much closer to real binary decision making than chess.

how is this related to the moves in the last 15 minutes? why is this be a key reason that checkers is more difficult and relevant than chess? perhaps Mr. Millhone will ask some of the computer literate checker players to expand on this theme so that we will never hear again "he plays checkers while the real smarty plays chess."

let us hope in the new regime that the platform will not cancel by suppression any views that are not woke as they do with so many posters like me. I can reach a wide swath only by paying which I'd be much more willing to do if fair play all around.

it is interesting that my post on nand was noticed by 300 people on the platform. perhaps it was mistakenly considered a not (the unifier or his counterpart). what would the platform's earnings be if they had to deduct from earnings like all other companies their salary expense?

the three major problems with get-rich or trading schemes is: (1) multiple comparisons, (2) ever-changing cycles, (3) lack of testing, (4) self interest, or (5) front running. i have to laugh when half of the reviewers of Ed Spec complain and rate it the worst because "he doesn't give you any trading systems that work."

Vic's twitter feed


Comments

Name

Email

Website

Speak your mind

Archives

Resources & Links

Search