Aug

12

Positive Economic News: Full-Time vs Part-Time Employment Growth
Over the past year the pace of full-time hiring has outstripped that of part-time positions. Both categories are growing, but full-time roles have seen a steeper upward trajectory once we normalize for scale. This signals that employers are increasingly confident in committing to long-term payrolls.

To compare growth on equal footing, we fit simple linear regressions to each series (full-time employment level and part-time employment level) over the same interval. We used monthly seasonally adjusted data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. For each series, we calculated the slope (employees per month) of the best-fit line. Those slopes became our normalized growth measures, avoiding raw-level distortions.

Empirical Results

Full-Time Employees +2150.00
Part-Time Employees +950.44
The full-time slope of +215 K/month means that on average, net full-time headcount has risen by 215,000 each month. Part-time roles have climbed as well, but at roughly 44 percent of the full-time rate.

A faster acceleration in full-time positions suggests businesses are shifting from flexible or contingent staffing toward more stable, long-term commitments. This pattern often accompanies stronger consumer confidence and investment plans.

Hiring more full-time workers typically entails higher benefits, training, and overhead, so firms generally only follow through when they foresee sustained demand. The fact that part-time growth remains positive underscores broad underlying strength in the labor market.

Consumer spending power will likely rise as more workers move into full-time, benefit-eligible roles. Wage growth pressures may pick up if the pool of available long-term hires tightens further.
Capital expenditure plans may accelerate as firms brace for continued demand and aim to boost productivity.


Comments

Name

Email

Website

Speak your mind

Archives

Resources & Links

Search