Apr
22
International (viz the USA) diversification, from Big Al
April 22, 2023 |

Caught a discussion of the benefits/drawbacks of international diversification for US investors, so I had to do at least some basic counting and found that over the last 10 years, using weekly % changes, SPY and VXUS (Vanguard ex-US ETF) have a correlation of +0.85. But SPY provided twice the return (155% vs 74%).
If you want an uncorrelated asset, EEM (MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) had about a zero correlation with SPY or VXUS…but a return of about -10%!
Hernan Avella responds:
This is a rather unsophisticated way to look at the issue of diversification. How about you extend the lookback period, run some simulations, perhaps including a withdrawal rate. Anyways, to some extent I agree with the idea that US investors might be ok with a bit less international diversification vs investors from other countries. 20-30% should be ok. I believe all cap funds for international might not be optimal, I prefer to use cheap multifactor funds. Mother Vanguard is recommending 40+% in foreign.
Starting period is a bit unfair to US equities, but it's the longest overlapping period of the 4 funds. Since Jan 1999, cagr and correlation:
S&P 500 +6.97%
International value (DFIVX) +6.02% cagr .82 corr
Emerging value (DEMSX) 10.52% cagr .75corr
China (MCHFX) 10.79% .53 corr
The framework on a forward basis should be robust/agnostic to globalization - deglobalization, war, currencies crisis. Passive, Cap weighted is a good starting point.
Big Al replies:
Yes, different lookback periods and different funds give you different results. My point is that it's hard to sell people on diversification given the last 10 years.
John Floyd adds:
How do we best consider this on a forward looking basis?
1. What about a reversion given massive US outperformance vs ROW past 10 years plus led by tech mega caps?
2. What about massive reshoring to NA (Canada, Mexico, US) of US and non-US firms given COVID, geopolitics, etc.
3. China had one of the greatest credit booms in history with the speed and size (beyond Japan in 80s, US in 2000s, etc.), that game is over.
H. Humbert writes:
The Sage has Japan in his sights:
Warren Buffett’s trip to Tokyo is seen as a ‘stamp of approval’ for investing in Japan
“For Japanese institutional investors, this really is now the stamp of approval that Japan can deliver superior returns,” Monex Group’s Jesper Koll told CNBC’s Street Signs Asia.
BTW, I had owned exactly one Japanese stock in my life prior to last year, and obscure bra maker, and it hasn't gone anywhere, literally. But in the beginning of last year to me Japan started appearing really attractive, especially for dividend-paying value stocks which is the only kind I buy, so I bought two stocks: TAK, at the beginning of the year which so far has provided a 24% return not including the 4% dividend and KNBWY a year ago which provided an 11% return not including a 3% dividend (both are documented online at the time of purchase). Nothing to write home about but better than the market. If you consider that they are one of the largest pharma companies and beverage companies in the world selling for peanuts, you couldn't find anything of comparable value and safety profile in the US at the time.
Hernan Avella asks:
Mr Humbert, what % of your portfolio did you put in 2 stocks?
H. Humbert replies:
1% for the first one and 0.5% for the second one. Since I own over 200 stocks that's my typical purchase size for something I don't have any particular conviction about. I don't believe in concentrated portfolios since (a) I don't trust my own judgment THAT much (b) I never sell other than in rare cases for tax loss purposes, so this way regardless of what the stock does it never becomes a critical part of my portfolio so I have to trim it and pay taxes.
I also bought four British stocks, so pretty soon you run out of percentage points this way, but way over half of my purchases last year were in foreign stocks. I found much better values abroad, but the European stocks had different reasons to be more attractive than the Japanese ones.
Comments
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles