Aug
18
Business Start Up Advice, from Bo Keely
August 18, 2014 |
I'm making plans to go into my own business after next year's travels. Specifically, a more turnkey business that will give me free time. Like a corner store.
If you had $100k to $300k in cash… what business would you get into? The goal is something that is stable, not subject to trends or fads and that operates itself as much as possible.
I think the approach should be to pick the location, and then the type of business. I learned this from swap meets.
Next, make it something you would do for free, or nearly so, like as a hobby.
Invest VERY little initially–get the tiniest toe wet because the rest can follow. This is another definition of business patience. If the type of business is unique and can't be copied, all the better. If it may be franchised down the line, the better still. The choice of business should be something nearly everyone wants that nearly no one else may supply. (If others might imitate, then plan to get in quick, get out quick with a profit, and a smile).
Whatever the business, it seems bright on day one; and whatever the profit, it will grow dull on day 1000. So, don't put much into inventory and be sure you can step out on a 24 hour notice.
Never take a free drink or any freebie from anyone.
Comments
3 Comments so far
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
Long time since I dropped by to read here, so forgive me if I’m out of turn, but doesn’t this post really just say that the idealized startup is a frictionless, risk free, perfectly liquid, investment?
“operated itself as much as possible” - no sweat equity?
“not subject to trends or fads” - looking for risk free return?
“Invest very little initially … be sure you can step out on 24hr notice” - liquidity is free, also?
‘if the business is unique or can’t be copied… or franchised the better still ….” - a frictionless investment that has barriers to entry?
I’m tempted to say that this is wishful thinking posing as advice, but i’m downright confused, if only because nothing relates to startup business as I understand startup business at all. If anything, the “not subject to trends or fads” line, inclines me to believe that the objective must be within a mature market, not a classical startup looking to sell innovative product or technology or delivery of product, where some disruptive angle gives arise to massive growth potential.
I’d that the bit I am missing out?
I can point to a business curiosity of my own observation, that in some ways fulfills all of these criteria, however: financing contract magazines, as are produced for sporting events, and trade associations. Quite a few of these contracts trade only when a sales team moves, and every few years a team breaks away to start a publisher which lasts about as long as the team’s social cohesion. Selling ads for the PGA official guide is a known, stable, market. Risk is low, it’s the same sales team as before. But capital is very poorly managed in many of the publishers I at least used to look at in depth, there’s literally no published accounts for many. So the only way in is as a kind of invoice factor, taking credit risk against the sales and accepting a component of your fees as warrants. Often a few hundred thousand dollars will meet their needs to break away with the contract (non compete is much harder to enforce in the EU, and can be avoided by a clean room design of the new company), to pay wages, and you can extend according to invoices coming in, and even with warrants, fees (return) is good, and on a short horizon. Warrants have no value in a unlisted new private company with no share capital paid, but are simply another way of saying, as Mike Millen once did, miss a payment and i’ll take the company away. (warrants pegged to a valuation so they potentially can dilute other stakes, or with a first right to be bought out on any equity round)
Forgive me a very loose and fast example, because I did not go into covenants that allow a exit, or mitigate risk, such as being paid down when normal bank financing is in place, or the things you have to do in default event to publish a title to get receivables paid. But really very nice contracts for single issue or infrequent magazines used to change hands frequently, and I used to pay attention. At one time, here in London, publishing startups were grown like mushrooms, often with some usual suspects at the helm, and they always over reached and blew up, with incredible predictability. They are highly profitable, or can be, but lack of ready financing and something of a cultural shift also, has led to the large conglomerate publishers rounding them up, and burdening them with middle management fat. But for a long time, the only information you might need was who was leading sales. Then there is the fun of what can be done with vanity magazines which get discovered by a good sales team, finding a good demographic in e.g. a private bank cardholders magazine, and that’s a arbitrage that was effected by roving teams of sales guys, but never exploited to the extent it could have been. Even better, lay off your risk by selling options to other advertisers who are borderline customers: worst case is they take the fill and offset the expense against their marketing and get a full tax expenditure ticket, and they’re almost always effectively covered for losses up to their tax deduct for marketing. Go one further, and treat selling to the marginal advertisers as a cash and carry component, and they can participate whilst financing your position.
My apologies, it’s not a corner store, and more complicated than something you might assume as a hobby, but it is potentially a example of a business that has short horizons, potentially no cost of entry bar identifying and new company registrations set up by existing sales managers, some equity risk and equity like returns but, depending, a credit risk component that is far better known, and you could quickly effect a exit in most conditions.
In my neighborhood, not a single corner store, with which the streets are lined, gets the idea that when inventory is sold, they might order some more. I go shopping for my usual odds and ends I am too lazy to remember, and end up .. I fib, I have quit lately after years of this.. lecturing on the concept of identifying lines which sell, out of frustration in my failure to make a simple purchase. I gave up, because I proposed casually, but into some debate, to one store I knew well, a partnership deal.. they had no stock, no working capital, as we talked a potential customer literally walked out in disgust having found nothing.. they smiled and brushed me off, saying they were okay, and closed their doors for good, only days later. Given they’re not unique, and few small stores about here seem to have adequate working capital, one could strike a number of deals. I’m glad I didn’t have to end up negotiating my way out of a lease, though. Small stores are so profitable, big chains are opening in improbably small locations, but the carried lines are so restricted by shelf space, I believe there’s opportunity yet. There’s ten small stores down shy of half mile stretch… and not counting those on side streets…
Back to my original point, though, was this really not wishful thinking? Chance of a follow up?
As a terrific writer, Bo Keely is perfectly positioned for a startup that meets his criteria. Internet publishing of books (any adventure will do) as outlined by a post of a few months ago allows for working (writing) when one feels the urge and when finished can be sold on Amazon.Com while exploring the world (including the Amazon). For the more ambitious, a low cost subscription service of a post a week could bring in a nice cash flow with very little capital (in $, not time) risk.
A friend once told me of someone he met once that operated a cotton candy machine out of a modified Air Stream trailer. The fellow claimed he traveled to various festivals, flea markets, rodeos, country fairs, etc. and made profits in the 6 figures.
Seems like a small business that would also have the added benefit of allowing mobility/travel