Aug
13
Know Thine Enemy, from Duncan Coker
August 13, 2014 |
I think knowing your counterparty in a trade falls under “to know thine enemy” and is always of value. These days, however, it is hard to verify or test. In floor trading there are locals and the ubiquitous “paper” when it come to fills. I would much rather trade against the latter then the former. With electronic trading I used to have a theory I was trading against the retailer traders who would not hold over night, or the trend followers who would tolerate losses in the short-term. But these were hard to verify even then, and now I would not propose those theories as valid. I have yet to develop an alternative theory.
Comments
1 Comment so far
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
It occurred to me, that the onslaught of HFT and ETFs has left me wondering if there’s any retail action left at all. Or any small institutional action, even. WSJ had a piece a few weeks back, on the emptiness of UBS’s vast trading floor, now filled with back office staff. Is the market really such a ghost town?
Askance, I looked about the bitcoin game, and hey presto, up came blog entries describing how a exchange kept making a market by stalling fills until it could buy enough from the order queue, as a effective “circuit breaker”, but that means anyone selling was trading against the exchange, at that point, not the market. The difficulty of analyzing the data for a market feed (of “real” markets, due to volume of data, of bitcoin “exchanges” due to inherent complexity of the settlement as well as exchange peculiarities) inclines me to think the general perception is that the profit center has become merely churning the spread, to heck with the customers. Flickering through my memory is a quote from Liar’s Poker, when a trader quipped they might as well fire the customers. Well as they might… Nanex do a useful job, however, unraveling the hosepipes of latterday tickers.
I don’t see any role, for a traditional trader, any more. It’s a fairy tale remembrance, to reflect that keeping track, best one could, of the positions held about the street, might be any advantage. It’s a narrowing proposition, whether even a direction view can be filled at a fair price, or filled at all, when your order is hen pecked by the algos, who meanwhile take their fills everywhere but where you saw a price you liked.
Only half jokingly, I think the reason there’s interest in things like bitcoin, and making markets of alternative investments of any kind, is lonely traders seeking some action. Quite a few of the LIFFE locals, on computerization, quit and headed to trade fish at the Billingsgate market, where they at least got some action to liven their day. The only action I get is sipping my drink perusing tradingpitblog.com which I admire for collating enjoyable nostalgia, and being guilty of selling a book on market hand signals, for which plug I hope I cannot be accused of diverting your attention gratuitously, I’m unconnected to that effort entirely, but feel compelled to mention it in the context it feels downright strange to feel nostalgic for… nostalgic in the way one might for obsolete computer equipment that is now archaic and slow, what, when I grew up, I felt was the stuff of life.
Sorry Vic et.al., if I seem to be spamming your blog, it’s a slow summer, and I’ve been at a loss for a philosophical approach to investing, needing to return to it, as I exited completely a while back and have too great a fear of cash devaluation, and being a fan since it came out of TEOAS, came here for refreshment and vitality. Refreshment, in a curious form, I must thank you for. But, though I have read only a handful of posts so far, I think three or four years since last lurking, I find more questions than hypotheses. Of itself, that suggests to me, that the markets are more out of whack than they have been possibly ever. For if who derived theory from checkers and hobo wisdom, hoodoos and Beethoven, with nod to Hofstadter I always thought, there, is home to such fundamental questions… I leave that thought unfinished.. I timorously wonder if I may have found a passing home for the “investing lost” muses of my mind? Or a daycare center for the disinvested… (and admittedly a little disaffected by the markets) Forgive me, I seek humor in humility and wisdom only from the wit of saying, by apology, my cup is empty, if it overflowed, it could not be filled, so I do not demand it is ‘plenished.