Jan
8
Pseudo Events, by Victor Niederhoffer
January 8, 2007 |
Daniel Boorstin's 1961 book The Image described the illusions, contrivances, simulations, and unreality — what he calls pseudo events — in news, travel, heroic ideas, books, celebrity worship, desire for prestige, advertising, business practises, etc.. He shows how one pseudo event can lead to another, and can become a self-fulfilling prophecy in which more falsity must follow. He attributes the growth of pseudo events to a chain started by the graphics revolution, which began with faster newspaper printing and telegraphs in the early 1800's. Boorstin characterises a pseudo event as one that is not spontaneous, and is planned primarily for the purpose of being communicated and replicated. It is ambiguously relative to reality, and designed to become self fulfilling. The news leak and the press interview are often prime recurring examples of pseudo events. He distinguishes pseudo events from propaganda by pointing out that the former is ambiguous whilst the latter is an appealing falsehood.
One finds that many pseudo events occur in the market, such as all the events that are leaked by actors in the fray, with a view to eliciting behavior that will help them in their jobs, happiness and wealth. The best example of this would be leaks by the various powerful boards and agencies related to the markets which support their favored news reporters and former or prospective brokerages. Other examples could be a leak of earnings or sales numbers to a reporter, the expansive modality that a high official takes when trying to show importance to a reporter of the opposite sex, the interview of a fund-manager or some great like the Palindrome or the Sage to describe his feelings concerning the dollar, gold, the market, or the likelihood of a crisis. Also the appearance at an investors conference of some elite system seller, the article written by an academic describing various anomalies he has discovered in a major retrospective file, the speech at an industry conference by the promoter of one technology or the other, the report of a hedge fund manager that he sees a 30% chance of a disaster to rival 1929, the theoretical mathematico-econometric arguments boiled down for the public of this or that academic showing that the solution to our problems would be less inequality, the prohibitions against cut throat competition or freedom of entry in all its forms so that no economic agent will be induced to offer anything but a Cadillac product, the protection of the public from using a product that is unsafe without regard to the benefits, the rules of thumb concerning following the trend, the buy and sell recommendations provided by star financial news people. The list of pseudo events in the markets is greater than the list that Boorstin elicits in our cultural life! I propose that a classification scheme for market events be developed in terms of their pseudo or actual occurrence, and that this should take into account whether each event has a definite time of occurrence and magnitude, as well as the information value of any ambiguous messages making up or relating to its content. I would be interested in other ideas as to how to navigate the minefield of pseudo-ness we are exposed to, with a view to precluding the public from losing so much more than they have to, as well as going about life as puppets beset by false strings.
George Zachar comments:
When I taught a course called "The Politics of Communication" in a remote town in upstate New York, that book and the concept of "pseudo events" were literally at the top my syllabus.
It is a crucial concept, and must be central to anyone's use of any information that is subject to prior filtration.
The types of infomercials enumerated by the chair should be transparent to market professionals. The dangerous ones are those that appear to be untainted, leaving specs with their mental guards down.
One useful test is to google the board members of any research outfit one is unfamiliar with. Within seconds, the agendas and motives become clear.
To pick an obvious example from today, I poked around the background of a Yale professor whose anti-inequality schtick is the meme-du-jour. In about a minute I traced him to a think tank chock-a-block with Clintonites.
George Zachar further adds:
Following up on the chair's discussion of pseudo events and the need to categorize them, I would like to suggest a related game.
This link goes to a program that generates bingo cards using buzz-phrases related to Apple media events.
Why not have Doomster Bingo(tm)? Each card needs 24 phrases or concepts, and the first player getting five in a row wins.
Now, what should go in the boxes on the cards?
Overbought
Overextended
Frothy
Buffet
Prechter
Soros
Barrons
Options Scandal
Executive Compensation
Consumer debt
Savings rate
The dollar
Inverted yield curve
Housing prices
Schiller
Peak oil
Carbon tax
Over-leveraged
…no doubt there are dozens of other better, candidate phrases.
Perhaps we can have a party game where one reads a random Abelson column aloud as folks check their cards…
Professor Charles Pennington offers:
This is just a start, but I predict that at least six will be found in next week's Abelson column.
frothy
"Those who don't remember history …"
bubble (extra points for "South Sea")
tulip mania
dead cat bounce
inflation
stagflation
deflation
rising dollar
falling dollar
overheated economy
recession
1929
March 2000
"predicted 1987 crash"
stock tips from shoe-shine boys
"sentiment well off the lows"
hubris
"the smart money"
"This time it's different." (this is used in an ironic sense to mean "this time it's not different; it's going down just like in 1929.")
a double negative, as in "One might not be uninclined to take profits."
"October is a bad month to buy stocks … others are November, December, January …"
"more concerned about return of capital than return on capital"
"Rule Number 1: Don't Lose Money; Rule Number 2: Don't Forget Rule Number 1"
margin of safety
Keep some powder dry.
Look out below.
"an esteemed economist/stockpicker/broker/proprietor at X, but we won't hold that against him"
Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles