Dec
4
Symmetry, from Victor Niederhoffer
December 4, 2007 |

The symmetry of the S&P today, with the open and close at the bottom, two ascents from the mid-bottom to a round number of 1470 from 10am to 11am, and 2pm to 3:30pm, a rally from a midpoint to a high of 1472, and then closing in the last half hour, as happens so often, right at the bottom within a gnat's eyelash of the open, was quite remarkable, all within a very tame 10 point high to low range, same as yesterday, in contrast to the 30 point ranges of last week. Also remarkable was the previous run of four consecutive down Mondays followed by big up Tuesdays, in the best Frank Crossian tradition, with this Monday, the fifth big down in a row, followed by a miserable Tuesday.
Remarkable also was how the traditional pilot fish Israel and the new Israel-substitute pilot fish, Japan, had the move today in their sights.But how would you quantify all this, especially the symmetry. Is geology, architecture, chemistry, or biology the correct template? I'd be interested in readers' thoughts.
Anatoly Veltman remarks:
Symmetry: if you put up one month's hourly gold bar chart, you'll likely fall off your chair! I have been profitably trading every single wave for a month including today's, relying a lot on its symmetry. The thin (or gapping) areas tend to be repeated on the way back: those are low-volume price areas. The congestion areas also tend to repeat: those are price-volume areas. Alas, this exercise remains part of my discretionary trading — to try and quantify this, you'd probably need Jim Simons's resources!
Pitt Maner III adds:
From a geologist's perspective perhaps the best way to analyze the symmetry on display is to rotate the graph 90 degrees and pretend that it is a well (electric) log. The negative gray or dark space above the S&P line thus becomes transformed into layers of rocks. One might then interpret (if viewed as a caliper log) the market open as a "harder sandstone unit" which was followed by softer shales until another hard sandstone unit was drilled through at around 1130 AM. A bit of cyclicity on display.
In nature cyclical packages of deposited rock types that create these well log responses are sometimes related to world-wide sea level changes (e.g. coal cyclothems). It is the job of the stratigrapher to try and correlate different units on a local and global scale–somewhat analagous perhaps to trying to correlate responses in different world markets, although on entirely different timescales.
Of course knowing where you are in a geologic sequence, a depositional environment, etc. is critical to finding oil. Pattern recognition, mental visualization, imagination and interpretive experience would be useful attributes to have for finding "black gold-Texas tea".
It seems then that there would be very advanced signal processing techniques and data crunching software packages in use in the petroleum industry that might have applications useful to the financial community. The two most recognized companies in this field are Schlumberger and Halliburton. Images/examples from the Schlumberger website illustrate some of the advanced technologies in use.
Jim Sogi extends:
From the oceanographic point of view, in Hawaii this winter we hadn't had big waves for weeks, which is unusual for this time of year, but the last few days the waves have been over 15-20 feet. They start coming in waves of storm weather systems 3 or 4 days apart generated off ocean in Northern Japan. This is similar to market waves of volatility, and lulls between which seem to have a 3 or 4 day pattern to them. On a smaller scale, the waves themselves come in sets, with lulls in between. This pattern is a result of random groupings of waves overlapping from differing storms but that form a pattern of wave sets alternating big waves with lulls. December 4 was a lull in the market. November 28 was a big set wave. Last month was a big storm. The alternation in between seems to be quite sudden. Last night's Japan markets seemed to presage this morning's rise much as the storms there create our waves in Hawaii.
This post was started on December 4, and the open of December 5 shows a remarkable gap up in a rapid return to volatility after a lull.
The idea is that a regular but simple system, such as wave generation, cellular automata, and markets generate random patterns in systems, much in the same way as storms of Japan generate waves. The wave propagates at varying speeds and sizes due to normal variation then overlap and combine so as to form clusters of volatility and calmness as a regular result of the process in a pattern. This happens in markets just as in the ocean. Big Al mentioned that increased volatility creates higher correlation even in purely random sequences. The clustering phenomenon might be similar. There are a number of mathematical wave models and algorithms used by oceanographers.
Newton's studied astronomical phenomenon in Principia such as the length of time for various orbits and time to return in addition to distance. The cycle of times in waves clusters in markets is critical, as is the measure of distance.
Kim Zussman presents his findings:
Continuous SP futures 1/31/07-12/04/07 were partitioned into 15 min return segments for each "day" session (630-1315 PST). The first return was for 630-645, next 645-700…..1315. This produced 27 15 min return segments; 13 before 1000 and 13 after. Then the returns were sorted to align the equivalent first half-day segments with their mirror-images for the second half day (the first 15min aligned with the last 15 min, etc). The time segment alignments were:
645 1315
700 1300
715 1245
730 1230
745 1215
800 1200
815 1145
830 1130
845 1115
900 1100
915 1045
930 1030
945 1015
Then the two mirror-return series were checked for correlation. The idea is that symmetrical days would have high correlation between the first half day and the mirror image of the second half (picture a graph of the day creased vertically at mid-day, and folded back on itself). For 2007, the mirror-correlation ranged from -0.71 to +0.60 (mean -0.007).
It is possible that categorizing days as to mirror-correlation symmetry, and further specifying o-c up/dn, and concave up/dn could have predictive value. Here are the 10 most mirror-correlated days:
date Mirr corr
02/22/07 0.60
03/29/07 0.60
04/25/07 0.60
07/05/07 0.55
10/04/07 0.55
11/19/07 0.54
11/08/07 0.53
02/20/07 0.53
07/23/07 0.48
08/13/07 0.47
Comments
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles