May
1
Tantrums in Young Competitors, from Nigel Davies
May 1, 2018 |
I heard about a kid recently who broke his table tennis bat in anger after a loss. When his parents wouldn't get him a new one he stopped playing competitively.
My take on this met with some surprise–just get him another bat and send him back in there. If money is a problem take it from other privileges, for example trips to a particular eatery.
My reasoning is that competition, whilst having huge potential benefits, is tough and it needs time to learn to manage yourself within this kind of environment. Parents and coaches don't help if and when they stoke up the pressure with any kind of blame.
Thoughts?
Comments
11 Comments so far
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- Older Archives
Resources & Links
- The Letters Prize
- Pre-2007 Victor Niederhoffer Posts
- Vic’s NYC Junto
- Reading List
- Programming in 60 Seconds
- The Objectivist Center
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Tigerchess
- Dick Sears' G.T. Index
- Pre-2007 Daily Speculations
- Laurel & Vics' Worldly Investor Articles
I disagree with Mr. Davies. Teaching a child that “actions have consequences” and “certain behaviors are unacceptable” is very important from a young age, and Mr. Davies’ approach reinforces bad behavior. Regardless whether you use a carrot or a stick to teach socialization, tolerating tantrums and bad sportsmenship leads to far greater problems in the future.
It has been well established that authoritarian parenting ensures behavioral compliance but at the cost of low self esteem and other emotional problems.
I sympathize with Mr. Davies and the Kid. Punishment needs to be proportionate. For example, stopping the Kid playing in the next tournament might have been fair; or docking some pocket money. but missing the fact that anger was part of the will to win and killing all participation… Too much.
John McEnroe is now a charming commentator.
Roger Federer once said of himself that it took him to realise that his anger (which used to be uncontrollable) was holding him back to focus the energy in a positive direction.
Imagine if his parents had stopped buying him rackets!
https://scroll.in/field/859023/at-17-my-family-sent-me-to-see-a-psychologist-roger-federer-reveals-angry-teenage-phase
Was my comment/comparison to federer wrong?
Not sure why my previous comments were censored.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/sports/tennis/10federer.html
ah - apologies (was still awaiting moderation)
Nigel,
I’ve anecdotally observed that kids, whose parents are psychologists and so-called experts, are among the most screwed up as adolescents and adults. This subject is addressed in the book “Growing Up Jung: Coming of Age as the Son of Two Shrinks”. So I caution you about statements like “it has been well established” since there are vast numbers of confounding variables including whether the parents are divorced (and why); how many and what gender siblings; the child’s innate personality characteristics; and on and on. At the end of the day, there are good kids and bad kids. There are spoiled brats. There are over achievers and under achievers. And there is no user manual for parenting that actually works. I’ll just say that if your kid ever throws a tantrum in my house during a ping pong match, he will not be invited back. And that will be more about teaching my children a lesson than teaching yours.
Jean,
It sounds as if some psychologist(s) have upset you, but here meanwhile are some stats on the table that should make people think twice before congratulation themselves on their Stepfordesqueness:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26939843
“congratulating”
Nigel,
I think you are a decent chess player and a nice chap. But you are a very insecure parent or you wouldn’t be soliciting advice from total strangers which you then challenge when you don’t like what you hear.
My conclusion is your kid is misbehaving and rather than setting boundaries, you are googling justifications for not intervening. I further speculate that you are divorced and you fear that if you set boundaries, your child will rather spend time with your ex-wife than with you. This is classic. And it’s very sad.
But what the heck do I know? All I can say is, despite my so-called authoritarian parenting, my kids are doing great by any objective standard.
So go read your psycho babble that justifies the fact that your kid is behaving like a brat and that’s ok … and we’ll how that works out for him…in 5, 10 and 15 years….And if things turn out poorly, you’ll be able to blame the so-called experts rather than yourself for ignoring common sense….
Check mate.
Jean,
Some things for your information: When I posted this it was genuinely about some other kid, not my own son. Despite my liberal attitudes towards behavior my son is a star at school for both concentration and behavior, and is probably better in several fields that you will be in any. Apart from that clarification I have no interest in continuing our conversation, so the very best of luck to you. One thing though, it would be helpful for your personal development if you used a real name rather than hide your faux respectability behind anonymity.