Nice scandal in New York, where hedgefundist Albert Vilar is in jail for
converting money from his tech fund to pay for gifts to charities. He is
accused of robbing $5 million from girlfriend Lily Cates. The technique was
allegedly to start a fund, get her to put $5 million into it near inception, and
then use that money personally rather than sending it to initial third party
institution. Reminds me of an experience that a certain chemist had,where a chronic bear, boastful of his million-dollar forays into
shorting S&P futures on such things as employment data which hid the weakness in
our economy, apparently planned to start a fund with the chemist, but then after
the documents were signed and sealed became "unavailable". This might, and
I hope was, purely a coincidence.
Excellent movie "Ladies in Lavender" shows two sisters
in their 70s falling desperately in love with a young
violinist, ruining their sisterly relation and
equilibrium as the universal urge to compete and live
through the genes strikes in all such triangles. Reminds me
that competition is the main driving force responsible for
the high standards of living and superhuman efforts that
purveyors of products provide to satisfy our pitiless
desires.
The excellent book
Practical Biostatistical Methods by
Steve Selvin provides a supplementary second statistics
course with emphasis on useful and generalizable techniques
for ascertaining the incremental fits of models and
estimates that are highly appropriate for market
applications. Very accessible chapters for layman on
regression, analysis of covariance, discriminant analysis,
principal components analysis, contingency tables, logit
regression, and survival analysis.
The best way to get additional alpha for classes of
investments like funds-of-funds where the levels, depths,
extent and asymmetries of the fees place the take so high
relative to the return, like the martingale systems
the casinos all love, is to place less than 100% of your
assets, or less than a proportion compared to your bogey, in
such funds.
Thank goodness the Sage had Charlie
to restrain him from speculating so much more against the
dollar than the $22 billion he admitted to being short at Berkshire's last annual meeting. When will the first
brave soul write about this terrible investment that since
the end of the year may have created a greater loss in
magnitude than all the other investments he has made up to
that time? And how does he subtly engulf smart people like
his surrogate son at the computer software company and get
him to talk at Davos
about dollar weakness and how
the Chinese system is so much superior to ours because they
put the really smart people in government positions there,
without being too overt or pushy about it? Also, what will
happen to the market when word gets out that the possibility
or pressure to exit the position might at some
time arise?