|
|
|
|
![]() |
Daily Speculations The Web Site of Victor Niederhoffer & Laurel Kenner Dedicated to the scientific method, free markets, deflating ballyhoo, creating value, and laughter; a forum for us to use our meager abilities to make the world of specinvestments a better place. |
Write to us at:
(address is not clickable)
Forward
Long-term market analysis from us, our researchers and a distinguished group of trader/contributors.
04/12/2004 "The Bull That Will Not Die": Ross Miller of Miller Risk Advisors <http://www.millerrisk.com>, one of the smartest economists we know, sees a resurgence in inflationary psychology leading to a boom in stocks, especially growth companies involved in emerging technologies.
03/25/2004 Last year, we said stocks were wildly undervalued, based on the relation between predicted 2004 earnings, the 10-year price and the 10-year note rate -- a ratio widely known as the Fed Model. We asked researcher Tom Downing to run the numbers for 2004. His reading: a return of 20.5%. See Tom's calculations
03/02/2004 One very good thing to always remember is that the Fed does not often change direction in its qualitative rates, the discount rate, the margin rate, the reserve requirements, and now the fed funds rate. As I wrote in EdSpec, the runs of raising or lowering rates averaged three years from 1913 to Jan. 30, 1996, and involved about seven consecutive easings or tightenings. Since EdSpec's publication in 1997, there have been only four changes in direction. I looked at old newspapers from 1910 to get exact announcement dates for all these, a very good exercise for these long runs and all other events and experiments. When Dr. Greenspan said rates "would have to be higher eventually..." it became inevitable that someday, the fed funds rate will be increased. When that happens it will not be a trivial move.
02/17/2004 What's Not to Like About Equities?' Paul DeRosa's Outlook
03/01/2004
A Savvy Trader's Tip on TIPs:
TIPS are the mostly highly over-hyped
investment at the moment, and retail investors are being led
to slaughter as usual, courtesy of Pimco with their 4.5% load
fees, and excessive yearly fees in these funds.
TIPS will go DOWN when inflation returns, and the Fed
tightens, and real rates rise. TIPS do not increase in real
value when inflation develops. They merely go up or down in
real value when real interest rates change. People should not
buy what they don't understand. Pimco understands, but
recommended and started these funds in 2002, when levels and
opportunity were there. TIPS are in their late NASDAQ phase
right now because they have become the flavor of the week
because of their now historical out-performance (past, not
future). Same goes for REIT stocks.
03/28/2004 The Next 100-Baggers in Retail: A Speculative discussion.
02/5/2004 'Market Neutral' Funds: A Spec reflects on claims that market-neutral funds can tame volatility and generate alpha, and suspects either self-deception or hubris. (2/5/4)
03/9/2004 Are Japanese REITs a good investment? Views from Japanese Spec-Salaryman Shui Mitsuda.
03/18/2004 Gann Analyses of significant events are always good for a working hypothesis of an extreme. And now that we have 9-11 and 3-11, one can hypothesize that those days will be extremely bullish in the future. -- Victor Niederhoffer